Barry Kunst

Executive Summary (TL;DR)

  • The “Rise with SAP” initiative encompasses various migration strategies that directly impact long-term cost and risk management.
  • Critical failure modes often emerge in the silent phases of migration, leading to unintended consequences.
  • Governance considerations are paramount in navigating compliance and risk mitigation requirements during migrations.
  • Strategic use of data management solutions can enhance the effectiveness of migration efforts.

What Breaks First

In one program I observed, a Fortune 500 manufacturing organization discovered that its migration to a new SAP environment was hitting a wall. Initially, everything seemed to be progressing smoothly; they were confident in their readiness, and the stakeholders were optimistic. However, as they began to transition their critical data, a silent failure phase emerged. Important artifacts, such as historical transaction records and configuration settings, were not properly mapped to the new system, leading to data loss. The drifting artifact-unclear data ownership and governance-became apparent when the project team realized that the legacy data could not be reconciled with the new format. This moment became irreversible when they attempted to validate data flows during user acceptance testing, revealing significant gaps that would delay the go-live date and inflate costs.

This experience underlines a fundamental principle: the decisions made during the migration process can have lasting implications on cost, compliance, and operational integrity. Each step in the migration journey must be carefully scrutinized to avoid pitfalls that can jeopardize the entire project.

Definition: Rise with SAP

“Rise with SAP” is a comprehensive initiative designed to facilitate the migration of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to the cloud, enhancing business processes through tailored solutions and services.

Direct Answer

The “Rise with SAP” initiative is a multi-faceted program that enables organizations to migrate their ERP systems to a cloud-based platform. It focuses on leveraging SAP’s capabilities for process optimization while addressing cost efficiency and risk management throughout the transition. This initiative is particularly relevant for organizations looking to modernize their IT infrastructure and enhance their agility in responding to market changes.

Architecture Patterns

When considering the architecture patterns associated with “Rise with SAP,” organizations must evaluate various deployment options, such as public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid models. Each choice comes with its own set of implications for data management, security, and compliance.

  • Public Cloud: This option typically offers greater flexibility and scalability but raises concerns regarding data sovereignty and compliance with regulations such as GDPR. Organizations must ensure data governance policies are in place to mitigate risks associated with data breaches.
  • Private Cloud: Though offering enhanced control over data, this option may lead to higher operational costs. Many organizations must weigh the benefits of customization against the potential for vendor lock-in with traditional tools.
  • Hybrid Models: Combining both public and private cloud solutions allows organizations to balance cost and control. However, this complexity necessitates a clear governance structure to manage data across multiple environments effectively.
Architecture Pattern Benefits Challenges
Public Cloud Scalability, flexibility Data sovereignty, compliance concerns
Private Cloud Control, customization Higher costs, potential vendor lock-in
Hybrid Balanced control and cost Complex governance required

Implementation Trade-offs

In navigating the “Rise with SAP” initiative, organizations often face critical implementation trade-offs that can impact their overall strategy. Key decisions include:

  • Data Migration Strategies: Choosing between a “big bang” approach-migrating all data at once-or a phased approach can significantly affect project timelines and costs. A phased approach may reduce risks but can lead to inconsistencies in data across systems.
  • Customization vs. Standardization: While customizing the new ERP environment may seem appealing, it can complicate future upgrades and increase maintenance costs. Organizations must evaluate whether the benefits of customization outweigh the potential long-term costs.
  • Resource Allocation: Determining the right mix of internal resources versus external consultants is crucial. Underestimating the need for skilled personnel can lead to delays and increased costs, while over-reliance on consultants may lead to knowledge gaps.

Governance Requirements

Effective governance is a cornerstone of successful migrations under the “Rise with SAP” initiative. Organizations must establish robust data management frameworks that address compliance, security, and operational integrity.

  • Regulatory Compliance: Organizations must align their migration strategies with industry regulations, such as NIST SP 800-53 for security and ISO 27001 for information security management. Non-compliance can lead to significant penalties and reputational damage.
  • Data Governance: Establishing clear ownership and stewardship over data is critical. Organizations should implement frameworks such as DAMA-DMBOK to ensure data quality and integrity throughout the migration process.
  • Risk Management: Proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies should be integrated into every stage of the migration. This includes identifying potential failure modes and developing contingency plans to address them.
Governance Aspect Importance Common Pitfalls
Regulatory Compliance Ensures adherence to lleading enterprise vendor and standards Overlooking specific requirements
Data Governance Maintains data quality and integrity Lack of clear ownership
Risk Management Identifies and mitigates potential failures Neglecting contingency plans

Failure Modes

Understanding failure modes is essential for organizations embarking on the “Rise with SAP” initiative. Common failure points often stem from inadequate planning and oversight.

  • Data Loss: As noted in the war story, failure to properly account for historical data can result in significant operational disruptions. Organizations should prioritize data mapping and validation to prevent this risk.
  • Performance Issues: Migration can lead to performance degradation if not carefully managed. Organizations must conduct thorough testing and optimization to ensure that the new environment meets performance expectations.
  • User Resistance: Change management is often overlooked during migrations, leading to user resistance and low adoption rates. Organizations should invest in training and communication strategies to facilitate smoother transitions.

Decision Frameworks

To assist organizations in making informed decisions regarding their migration strategies, frameworks such as TOGAF and the ISO 27001 standard can provide valuable guidance.

  • TOGAF: The Architecture Development Method (ADM) within TOGAF can help organizations align their business goals with IT strategies. By following its structured approach, organizations can ensure that their migration aligns with overall business objectives.
  • ISO 27001: This standard provides a framework for establishing, implementing, and maintaining an information security management system (ISMS). Organizations should leverage this framework to address security concerns during migration.
Decision Options Selection Logic Hidden Costs
Migration Approach Big Bang, Phased Risk tolerance, timeline Potential downtime, data reconciliation costs
Customization Level High, Low Business needs, future scalability Maintenance, upgrade complications
Resource Mix Internal, External Skill gaps, project complexity Consulting fees, knowledge transfer risks

Where Solix Fits

In the context of the “Rise with SAP” initiative, Solix Technologies provides critical solutions that can enhance the migration experience. Our Enterprise Data Lake solution allows organizations to consolidate and manage data across various environments, ensuring data integrity and accessibility. Additionally, our Enterprise Archiving solution helps organizations efficiently manage historical data, reducing storage costs while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.

Organizations that implement our Application Retirement solution can effectively phase out legacy systems while preserving essential data for compliance and analysis. Furthermore, the Common Data Platform offers a unified architecture that simplifies data governance and analytics, enabling organizations to make informed decisions as they transition to the new SAP environment.

What Enterprise Leaders Should Do Next

  • Conduct a Thorough Assessment: Evaluate your current IT landscape and identify specific needs related to the “Rise with SAP” initiative. Engage stakeholders across the organization to understand their perspectives and requirements.
  • Establish Governance Frameworks: Develop robust data governance and compliance frameworks to guide the migration process. Ensure that your team is equipped with the necessary tools and knowledge to manage data effectively.
  • Implement a Change Management Strategy: Invest in training and support for users to facilitate a smooth transition. Address potential resistance by communicating the benefits of the new system and involving users in the migration process.

References

Last reviewed: 2026-03. This analysis reflects enterprise data management design considerations. Validate requirements against your own legal, security, and records obligations.

Barry Kunst

Barry Kunst

Vice President Marketing, Solix Technologies Inc.

Barry Kunst leads marketing initiatives at Solix Technologies, where he translates complex data governance, application retirement, and compliance challenges into clear strategies for Fortune 500 clients.

Enterprise experience: Barry previously worked with IBM zSeries ecosystems supporting CA Technologies' multi-billion-dollar mainframe business, with hands-on exposure to enterprise infrastructure economics and lifecycle risk at scale.

Verified speaking reference: Listed as a panelist in the UC San Diego Explainable and Secure Computing AI Symposium agenda ( view agenda PDF ).

DISCLAIMER: THE CONTENT, VIEWS, AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS BLOG ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT REFLECT THE OFFICIAL POLICY OR POSITION OF SOLIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS AFFILIATES, OR PARTNERS. THIS BLOG IS OPERATED INDEPENDENTLY AND IS NOT REVIEWED OR ENDORSED BY SOLIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IN AN OFFICIAL CAPACITY. ALL THIRD-PARTY TRADEMARKS, LOGOS, AND COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. ANY USE IS STRICTLY FOR IDENTIFICATION, COMMENTARY, OR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF FAIR USE (U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT § 107 AND INTERNATIONAL EQUIVALENTS). NO SPONSORSHIP, ENDORSEMENT, OR AFFILIATION WITH SOLIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IS IMPLIED. CONTENT IS PROVIDED "AS-IS" WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. SOLIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR ACTIONS TAKEN BASED ON THIS MATERIAL. READERS ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR USE OF THIS INFORMATION. SOLIX RESPECTS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. TO SUBMIT A DMCA TAKEDOWN REQUEST, EMAIL INFO@SOLIX.COM WITH: (1) IDENTIFICATION OF THE WORK, (2) THE INFRINGING MATERIAL’S URL, (3) YOUR CONTACT DETAILS, AND (4) A STATEMENT OF GOOD FAITH. VALID CLAIMS WILL RECEIVE PROMPT ATTENTION. BY ACCESSING THIS BLOG, YOU AGREE TO THIS DISCLAIMER AND OUR TERMS OF USE. THIS AGREEMENT IS GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF CALIFORNIA.